Use Formal Requirements and Reduce Test Efforts
Formal requirements differ from natural language requirements in that they use a predefined language to convey the same meaning.
Formal requirements differ from natural language requirements in that they use a predefined language to convey the same meaning.
While MC/DC may be a common term in software testing, its correct use and safety-relevant role still calls for clarification throughout the industry.
On 23 November we will be participating at the Annual User Conference Intland Connect 2021 in Stuttgart to showcase the integration of codebeamer and TPT.
In our tutorial on codebeamer and TPT we show you how to export test cases from TPT back to codebeamer.
In our tutorial on codebeamer and TPT we show you how to do import requirements and test cases and how to export test results in a few simple steps.
Testing based on requirements and maintaining traceability of requirements are invaluable components of efficient testing and test management. Download our White Paper on the subject, illustrated with the integration of TPT and codebeamer.
One of the test methods often employed in software testing involves equivalence classes. Simply put, system input is grouped into classes based on representative input domains.
It might sound trivial: The central goal of testing is to check whether a system does what it was designed for. How that goal is achieved, however, is already a bit less obvious. The answer lies in requirements-based testing – a central testing method for testing with TPT.