Home » TPT » Cloud Testing with TPT: Case Study with AGSOTEC » Costs in Cloud Testing » Cloud Testing: Cloud vs. Premise
Home » TPT » Cloud Testing with TPT: Case Study with AGSOTEC » Costs in Cloud Testing » Cloud Testing: Cloud vs. Premise
To better compare the costs of cloud computing with an on-premise infrastructure, it is useful to make a categorical comparison of cost components. All of this was examined in the context of our case study in collaboration with AGSOTEC.
Cost Points (see also Cloud vs. On-Premises: Cost-Benefit Comparison – computerwoche.de)
Even without specifically addressing individual costs, it is easily apparent that in our use case, the cloud is more cost-effective than on-premise solutions.
Why? Due to the requirements and operations in testing. In the automotive sector, there are typically traditional integration milestones where configurations with defined functional scopes need to be provided. Such fixed dates have the disadvantage that the entire software must be available on a specific day – and that in high quality for further internal tests, including by Quality Management departments and management.
However, this leads to short-term spikes in IT needs for the infrastructure because everything needs to be tested quickly and comprehensively.
By clicking 'I Accept' you agree to the storing of first- and third-party cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in Synopsys marketing efforts. For additional information, please see the Synopsys privacy policy. If you are under 16 and wish to give consent to optional services, you must ask your legal guardians for permission. You can revoke or adjust your selection at any time under Settings.
If you are under 16 and wish to give consent to optional services, you must ask your legal guardians for permission. Here you will find an overview of all cookies used. You can give your consent to whole categories or display further information and select certain cookies.